Introduction: How important is the church to Christian living? How
important is it to regularly meet with fellow believers? In my
religious freedom litigation, I generally have to prove the sincerity
of my client’s religious beliefs. Over the many years of litigation I
have noticed that those Christians who regularly worship with other
Christians are the most sincere. Most of my “sincerity” problems
arise from individuals who worship on their own. My conclusion is
just an observation and not a scientific poll. What does the Bible
teach us about the importance of the church in the controversy
between good and evil? Let’s dive in and find out!

  1. The Holy Spirit and the Group


    1. Read Acts 2:1-4. Who are “they” who are meeting together?
      (These are “believers” who probably are composed of the
      two groups mentioned in Acts 1:13-15.)


      1. Why are they together? (In Acts 1:8 Jesus told them
        He was going to send them the Holy Spirit. They were
        apparently assembled waiting for that event.)


      2. What they were waiting for happened! What
        significance do you find in the fact that the Holy
        Spirit first came upon them when they were in a
        group?


    2. Let’s go back and read Acts 1:12-14 to look at these two
      groups that made up the early Christian church. The first
      group: Jesus’ disciples, mother, brothers and “the women”
      got together to pray. Why pray in a group?


      1. Do you prefer to pray alone or in a group?


      2. Is there more power in group prayer?


        1. Read Matthew 18:19-20. Why does Jesus mention
          getting together a (small) group for answered
          prayer? (If you read the further context, Jesus
          is endorsing the church. The Lord obviously
          hears the prayers of individuals. However, there
          is apparently a dynamic to group prayer that is
          important to believers and God.)


    3. Read Acts 1:15-17, 20-22. This is the second group
      mentioned. What is the purpose of this group’s meeting?
      (This is an “organization” meeting.)


      1. What is the reason for having organization? (Peter
        (v.20) quotes Psalms about “leadership.” In verse 22
        Peter refers to being a “witness.” The purpose of the
        group is to organize leadership for witnessing.)



      1. Recently, I was in a church meeting to discuss re-organization for soul-winning. One member (at the end
        of the meeting) complained that we could have been
        out witnessing instead of being in the meeting. What
        do you think about that comment?


    1. Now that we have identified the group, let’s go back and
      look at Acts 2:1-4 again. We have a group praying
      together. We have a group organized for witnessing. What
      is the result? (Their prayers were answered and they
      received special power to witness.)


    2. Let’s read on: Acts 2:5-6, 41-42. What was the result of
      Holy Spirit-powered group witnessing? (3,000 new members.)


      1. Did these new converts go off on their own? (No! It
        says they devoted themselves to “the fellowship.”)


    3. After reading these verses, do you think “group action” is
      simply being reported to us, or is this the model for our
      Christian work?


    4. Read Acts 4:31-32. What do you think “the place where they
      were meeting was shaken” means? (They had an “earthquake”
      in the room.)


      1. Do you need an “earthquake” in your church? In your
        prayer group?


      2. Again, we see the believers in a group. Is that
        important? (Yes. Verse 32 tells us that they were of
        “one heart and one mind.” They were together, and
        they were looking for the Holy Spirit. He came to
        them in a most impressive way.)


    5. How do we get from where we are now in church, to where
      the early believers were?


  1. Persecution and the Group


    1. In Acts 4 we not only have the Holy Spirit making the
      earth move, we have Satan in action. Read Acts 4:1-3.
      What is bothering the Sadducees – that Peter and John are
      preaching about Jesus? Or, is it something else? (No doubt
      they do not want to hear Jesus preached. However, the
      problem is more fundamental. The Sadducees denied that
      there was a resurrection ( Matthew 22:23), so worse than
      talking about Jesus was talking about the fact that He had
      been resurrected from the dead!)


      1. Peter and John get jailed, why? Why not just debate
        them? (Force is the answer when you do not have an
        adequate logical answer.)


        1. Were the authorities just getting them out of
          the way for the evening? (No. Notice the phrase
          (v.3) “because it was evening.” The officials
          planned to do something to Peter and John, but
          it was time to for the authorities to go home.
          They put Peter and John in jail until the next
          day when the authorities could decide what to
          do.)



    1. Read Acts 4:4. We now have 5,000 believers. Why is the
      church growing so fast? Is it because believers are being
      jailed?


      1. Is it because the believers are working together?


      2. Is it because of the power of the Holy Spirit?


    2. If you believe that persecution makes the church grow more
      rapidly, tell me why? (I think the formula is just the
      reverse. On-fire Christians who are sharing the gospel
      attract the attention of the enemy.)


    3. In this episode, are any of the Christians working alone?
      (No. Even Peter and John are working together. Report
      after report is about group activity.)


  1. “Politics” and the Group


    1. Read Acts 6:1. I recently finished up a religious liberty
      case where my client, a former Southern Baptist minister,
      said that he left the SBC because he didn’t like the group
      politics. He was looking for a solitary religious
      experience. Were “politics” a problem in the early church?
      (Yes. It seems any time you have a group dynamic, you open
      up the possibility for “politics.”)


      1. What kind of “politics” is this? (This is a cultural
        problem.)


      2. How would you solve this? Do you think the Hebrew
        Jews were really not feeding the widows who were from
        the Greek culture?


    2. Read Acts 6:2. What does this text suggest is the nature
      of the problem? (The disciples suggest that this is a
      problem simply because not enough time and attention are
      being given to the matter.)


    3. Read Acts 6:3-5. What kind of names are these? (They are
      all Greek.)


      1. Let’s review this situation. The complaint is that
        the Greek Jewish widows are being discriminated
        against. Why choose Jews with a Greek background to
        administer the program?


        1. Isn’t this just rewarding “whiners?”


        2. If you had a similar problem in your church,
          would you handle it this way? Turn the program
          over to those complaining?


        3. What do you learn about the early church from
          this story? (This is a very interesting look
          into the attitude of the early church. Cultural
          charges of discrimination are made. Instead of
          denying the charges (which I feel certain were
          not the result of deliberate discrimination) the
          church votes to have those from the “victim”
          culturerun the program. There is no attempt to
          culturally “balance” this new group — they vote
          in Greeks!)


          1. Why do you think the early church did
            that? (This shows the “majority” culture
            trusted the minority culture. They were
            not afraid for the welfare of the Hebrew
            widows if they put the Greek Jews in
            charge.)


      2. What lessons do we learn about politics in the church
        and advancing the gospel? (This shows that in any
        group you can have misunderstandings. The important
        part is not the misunderstanding, but rather how you
        resolve it.)


      3. Do you see any advantage to having a group in this
        situation? (Sure. The church was running a type of
        social security system for widows. Without the
        organization, this would not have taken place.)


  2. Doctrines and the Group


    1. Read Acts 15:1-2. What is the problem?


      1. Why go to Jerusalem with this issue? Didn’t Paul and
        Barnabas already have their minds made up on this?
        (This shows they were willing to submit to church
        authority.)


      2. The lesson (Thursday) lists a whole group of famous
        Christians who did not submit to church authority.
        The list includes Martin Luther, Calvin, Zwingli,
        Melanchthon and Westley. Why did Paul and Barnabas
        submit to church authority and Luther and Westley did
        not?


    2. Read Acts 15:5-20, but pay particular attention to verses
      7, 12, 13, 19. Who discussed this issue? (The apostles and
      elders.)


      1. Who decided the issue? (It seems James did.)


      2. Did the group take a vote? (No.)


        1. What happened at this meeting is recounted in a
          letter recorded in Acts 15:23-29. Read. Do
          verses 25 and 28 indicate a vote was taken?
          (While it does not appear that a vote was taken,
          it also does not seem that James unilaterally
          made the decision. Instead, we get the picture
          that the Holy Spirit lead them all to the same
          conclusion. Praise God!)


        2. How can you have such agreement in your church
          meetings?


    3. How important was this doctrinal question to the church?
      (In Acts 15:19 James says it was making it difficult for
      Gentiles to join the church.)


      1. What do you think about this idea of getting rid of
        doctrines that make it difficult for new believers to
        join the church?



      1. Is it possible for a church to have too many
        doctrines – so that they get in the way of bringing
        in new members?


      2. How important is church doctrine, anyway? (What we
        have continually seen in the early church is
        agreement and consensus. Doctrines, as long as you
        don’t have too many, are a way to help the church
        stay in agreement. Certainly, the resolution of this
        doctrinal dispute was very important to keeping the
        church together.)


    1. Friend, the pattern of the early church was group prayer,
      fellowship and witnessing. They helped each other and they
      worked through their problems together. If you are not
      working with a group of Christians today, consider if you
      are missing the power and the blessing of a group united
      by the power of the Holy Spirit.


  1. Next week: The End of the Great Controversy